Canon相機收購,二手收購,收購相機,全新相機,二手相機 收購5D Mark IV,收購EOS-1D X Mark II,收購EOS M3/M10 收購canon canon 5Ds/5Ds R,,5D Mark III/6D II,7D Mark II 70D/80D,750D/760D,700D/100D 收購FUJIFILM 相機,全系列FUJIFILM 收購二手Nikon 相機,Nikon二手收購,全新Nikong買賣 D3400收購 Nikon 1 j5收購 D750 Df/D810/D610,D5/D4S,D500,D7200/D7500,D5500/D5300 OLYMPUS
▲ 推出 RF 24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z 鏡頭。(圖/canon相機收購canon 提供)
記者樓菀玲/台北報導
canon相機收購canon 宣佈推出全新鏡頭及配件,包括首支為影片及相片攝錄兩用而設計的 RF 鏡頭 RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z 及電動變焦轉接器 PZ-E2、輕巧超望遠變焦鏡頭 RF200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM ,和專為 APS-C EOS R 系列相機設計的輕巧超廣角變焦鏡頭 RF-S10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM 。
RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z 的推出進一步強大了 F2.8 光圈 L 系列變焦鏡頭陣容,作為首支為短片及相片混合型拍攝而設計的 RF 鏡頭,首次加入了光圈環及採用固定長度的內變焦設計。鏡頭更相容最新推出的電動變焦轉接器 PZ-E2 ,為鏡頭帶來電影鏡頭般的流暢伺服變焦操作,滿足專業攝影師、錄影師及進階使用者,對變焦速度及準確度的需求。
全新登場世界首支 800mm 超望遠變焦無反光鏡鏡頭1 RF200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM ,重量僅約 2,050 克,輕巧的設計減輕了手持攝影的負擔,令進階攝影愛好者能夠輕鬆捕捉鳥類、生態或戶外運動等主題。
首支為 EOS R APS-C 系列相機而設計的 RF-S 系列超廣角變焦鏡頭 RF-S10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM 全新登場,提供相等於 35mm 全片幅格式的 16-29mm 超廣角焦距,擴展了 RF-S 鏡頭的種類,為攝影愛好者帶來更寬廣視野。鏡頭輕便小巧、價格相宜並擁有高影像畫質,更配備光學影像穩定器,特別適合內容創作者及攝影愛好者拍攝 Vlog 、旅遊及風景等題材。
▲canon相機收購canon EOS R6 Mark II 正式在台開賣。(圖/canon相機收購canon提供)
記者陳俐穎/綜合報導
相機品牌 canon相機收購canon 今日正式宣布全新 EOS R6 Mark II 在台開賣,主打攝錄雙棲的強悍功能,一機同時滿足拍照與錄影兩大需求,無論是紀錄個人生活、專業影片製作皆能完美掌握動靜瞬間,非常適合用於婚禮拍照錄影、 Youtuber 或其他影片創作者。
全新 EOS R6 Mark II 大幅提升主體辨識及自動對焦追蹤能力及高速連拍功能。在自動對焦系統主體偵測能力方面,新增主體類別包括火車、飛機、馬匹,而眼睛偵測自動對焦則新增右眼優先或左眼優先對焦。電子快門提供最高約每秒 40 張 的高速連續拍攝。
在錄影方面更是新增許多強大功能,提供 4K 60P / 4K 30P (6K超採樣) 全視角無裁切影片格式、FHD 180P 高格率之6倍慢動作、無30分鐘錄影限制、影片拍攝前預錄設定 (3秒/ 5秒)…等,因此 EOS R6 Mark II 完整兼具了拍照及錄影功能,方便創作者輕鬆實現無限的創意。
根據canon相機收購canon資訊,EOS R6 Mark II單機身建議售價 76,900元,搭配RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM鏡頭之單鏡組(Kit) 建議售價為 86,900元。於活動期間內,購買申請通過審核送LP-E6NH原廠電池。
It fills me with glee that canon相機收購canon printers now think canon相機收購canon’s own toner is fake
It fills me with glee that canon相機收購canon printers now think canon相機收購canon’s own toner is fake
/
Chip shortage + DRM = schadenfreude
BySean Hollister, a senior editor and founding member of The Verge who covers gadgets, games, and toys. He spent 15 years editing the likes of CNET, Gizmodo, and Engadget.
Share this story
Sadly, not for consumer inkjets like this one.
Printers are the worst. They’re unreliable, they guzzle reportedly $12,000-a-gallon ink, and their manufacturers have been known to use dirty tricks, scare tactics, and DRM to strongly encourage you to buy cartridges exclusively from them. But canon相機收購canon is now getting a taste of its own medicine. Some of canon相機收購canon’s own toner cartridges are now being detected as fakes — and they’re forcing the company to teach customers how to bypass its own DRM (via Techdirt).
According to canon相機收購canon’s own support website (Europe, Germany), the company is “currently facing challenges in sourcing certain electronic components that are used in our consumables for our multifunction printers.” In other words, canon相機收購canon’s been hit by the great chip shortage, too — only the components canon相機收購canon’s missing aren’t powering video game consoles or your Tesla’s USB port; they’re the DRM for its own toner cartridges.
But wait, there’s a simple solution, says canon相機收購canon! See all our warnings about how your toner cartridge might be “malfunctioning”? Ignore them. Just hit the close button, and you’ll be good to go:
canon相機收購canon explains how to bypass its own DRM: just ignore the warning and hit the close button.Image: canon相機收購canon
If you’re hoping to experience an approved-bypassing-of-DRM on your inkjet home printer, though, you might be out of luck — we’re only seeing canon相機收購canon’s big workplace multifunction printers (MFP) on the list of “affected models” at canon相機收購canon’s website.
As Techdirt points out, canon相機收購canon is currently facing down a lawsuit involving some alleged behavior that seems even more egregious than the typical DRM tricks: Queens resident David Leacraft claims his canon相機收購canon Pixma All-in-One doesn’t even scan documents unless it has ink. We checked, and canon相機收購canon hasn’t yet issued a response to that lawsuit in court, but multiple posts on canon相機收購canon’s official support forums suggest that the ridiculous restriction is real.
“The PIXMA MG6320 must have all ink tanks installed in the printer and they must all contain ink in order to use the functions of the printer. Replacing the empty ink tank with a new ink tank will resolve this issue. There is no workaround for this,” wrote one rep in 2020.
“If you are getting a ‘Ink Out’ error, you will not be able to use the unit until the ink is replaced,” they wrote in 2016.
The lawsuit is seeking class action status, and we’ll let you know if it goes anywhere.
如今 Google Photos 的合作,將可以稍微緩解相關問題,canon相機收購canon 用戶只要按照原來照片傳輸的形式,就可以直接把照片備份到自己的 Google One 雲端帳戶,一來除了可以直接讓遠端的客戶透過 Google Photo 連結查看照片,一般家庭用戶也可以直接用相同的方式更新自己家裡的數位相框。
當然啦!這個作法有一個大前提,就是要成為 Google One 的用戶。canon相機收購canon 與 Google 雙方將開放用戶免費使用一個月 100GB 的 Google One 雲端空間。
Google 官方指出,自兩年前啟動 Google Photos 合作夥伴計劃至今,已經跟上百家廠商達成合作,藉此讓用戶可以用更簡單的方式,在其他產品直接觀看照片和影片。相關合作成果也在這兩年的大型展覽,好比說在 MWC 2018 期間,Google Photos 專區就展示了透過帶有螢幕的智慧喇叭,直接用類似數位相框的形式,顯示家庭相簿。
如今 Google Photos 的合作,將可以稍微緩解相關問題,canon相機收購canon 用戶只要按照原來照片傳輸的形式,就可以直接把照片備份到自己的 Google One 雲端帳戶,一來除了可以直接讓遠端的客戶透過 Google Photo 連結查看照片,一般家庭用戶也可以直接用相同的方式更新自己家裡的數位相框。
當然啦!這個作法有一個大前提,就是要成為 Google One 的用戶。canon相機收購canon 與 Google 雙方將開放用戶免費使用一個月 100GB 的 Google One 雲端空間。
Google 官方指出,自兩年前啟動 Google Photos 合作夥伴計劃至今,已經跟上百家廠商達成合作,藉此讓用戶可以用更簡單的方式,在其他產品直接觀看照片和影片。相關合作成果也在這兩年的大型展覽,好比說在 MWC 2018 期間,Google Photos 專區就展示了透過帶有螢幕的智慧喇叭,直接用類似數位相框的形式,顯示家庭相簿。
總之,canon相機收購canon EOS R8 以其輕巧的機身、卓越的性能和專業功能成為攝影愛好者和內容創作者的理想選擇,配有光學影像穩定器的 RF/RF-S 鏡頭與 EOS R8 的數位防震功能相結合,可實現更穩定流暢的影片效果。此外,OVF 模擬顯示輔助功能通過HDR技術提供更自然的高光和暗部漸變,重現傳統單眼相機光學觀景窗畫面。
高度靈活的 3 吋 162 萬點多角度 Clear View II LCD 觸控螢幕,讓攝影師能夠在高、低角度或繞過障礙物拍攝時尋找新的視角。此外,EOS R8 採用輕巧鎂合金機架加強耐用度,防塵防水滴設計則有助於防止灰塵和水滴滲入相機,目前已知 canon相機收購canon EOS R8 在台售價為 43,900 元,搭配 RF24-50mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM 鏡頭的 KIT 組合則是為 49,900 元。
如今 Google Photos 的合作,將可以稍微緩解相關問題,canon相機收購canon 用戶只要按照原來照片傳輸的形式,就可以直接把照片備份到自己的 Google One 雲端帳戶,一來除了可以直接讓遠端的客戶透過 Google Photo 連結查看照片,一般家庭用戶也可以直接用相同的方式更新自己家裡的數位相框。
當然啦!這個作法有一個大前提,就是要成為 Google One 的用戶。canon相機收購canon 與 Google 雙方將開放用戶免費使用一個月 100GB 的 Google One 雲端空間。
Google 官方指出,自兩年前啟動 Google Photos 合作夥伴計劃至今,已經跟上百家廠商達成合作,藉此讓用戶可以用更簡單的方式,在其他產品直接觀看照片和影片。相關合作成果也在這兩年的大型展覽,好比說在 MWC 2018 期間,Google Photos 專區就展示了透過帶有螢幕的智慧喇叭,直接用類似數位相框的形式,顯示家庭相簿。
擁 Nokia 品牌手機授權的 HMD Global,除了持續在市場上推出Nokia 手機之外,不久的將來亦將推出掛有「HMD」自有品牌的手機了!HMD Global 共同創辦人、暨董事長與首席執行長 Jean-Francois Baril 發文表示,HMD Global 正準備進入一個全新的時代,不只推出…繼續閱讀
canon相機收購 pline, or any successor to the CyberTipline operated by NCMEC.
There is no escaping this responsibility when and if CSAM is discovered:
(e)Failure To Report.—A provider that knowingly and willfully fails to make a report required under subsection (a)(1) shall be fined—
(1) in the case of an initial knowing and willful failure to make a report, not more than $150,000; and
(2) in the case of any second or subsequent knowing and willful failure to make a report, not more than $300,000.
What is not required is that companies actively seek out CSAM on their services:
(f)Protection of Privacy.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a provider to—
(1) monitor any user, subscriber, or customer of that provider;
(2) monitor the content of any communication of any person described in paragraph (1); or
(3) affirmatively search, screen, or scan for facts or circumstances described in sections (a) and (b).
These two provisions get at why Facebook and Apple’s reported numbers have historically been so different: it’s not because there is somehow more CSAM on Facebook than exists on Apple devices, but rather that Facebook is scanning all of the images sent to and over its service, while Apple is not looking at what is in your phone, or on their cloud. From there the numbers make much more sense: Facebook is reporting what it finds, while Apple is, as the title of Section (3) suggests, protecting privacy and simply not looking at images at all.
Apple Protects Children
Last week Apple put up a special page on their website entitled Expanded Protections for Children:
At Apple, our goal is to create technology that empowers people and enriches their lives — while helping them stay safe. We want to help protect children from predators who use communication tools to recruit and exploit them, and limit the spread of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM).
Apple is introducing new child safety features in three areas, developed in collaboration with child safety experts. First, new communication tools will enable parents to play a more informed role in helping their children navigate communication online. The Messages app will use on-device machine learning to warn about sensitive content, while keeping private communications unreadable by Apple.
Next, iOS and iPadOS will use new applications of cryptography to help limit the spread of CSAM online, while designing for user privacy. CSAM detection will help Apple provide valuable information to law enforcement on collections of CSAM in iCloud Photos.
Finally, updates to Siri and Search provide parents and children expanded information and help if they encounter unsafe situations. Siri and Search will also intervene when users try to search for CSAM-related topics.
John Gruber at Daring Fireball has a good overview of what are in fact three very different initiatives; what unites, them, though, and continues to differentiate Apple’s approach from Facebook’s, is that Apple is scanning content on your device, while Facebook is doing it in the cloud. Apple emphasized repeatedly that this ensured that Apple does not get access to your content. From the “Communications Safety in Messages” section:
Messages uses on-device machine learning to analyze image attachments and determine if a photo is sexually explicit. The feature is designed so that Apple does not get access to the messages.
From the “CSAM Detection” section:
Apple’s method of detecting known CSAM is designed with user privacy in mind. Instead of scanning images in the cloud, the system performs on-device matching using a database of known CSAM image hashes provided by NCMEC and other child safety organizations…This innovative new technology allows Apple to provide valuable and actionable information to NCMEC and law enforcement regarding the proliferation of known CSAM. And it does so while providing significant privacy benefits over existing techniques since Apple only learns about users’ photos if they have a collection of known CSAM in their iCloud Photos account. Even in these cases, Apple only learns about images that match known CSAM.
There are three ways to think about Apple’s approach, both in isolation and relative to a service like Facebook:2 the idealized outcome, the worst case outcome, and the likely driver.
Capability Versus Policy
Apple’s idealized outcome solves a lot of seemingly intractable problems. On one hand, CSAM is horrific and Apple hasn’t been doing anything about it; on the other hand, the company has a longstanding commitment to ever increasing amounts of encryption, ideally end-to-end. Apple’s system, if it works precisely as designed, preserves both goals: the company can not only keep end-to-end encryption in Messages, but also add it to iCloud Photos (which is not currently encrypted end-to-end), secure in the knowledge that it is doing its part to not only report CSAM but also help parents look after their children. And, from a business perspective, it means that Apple can continue to not make the massive investments that companies like Facebook have in trust-and-safety teams; the algorithm will take care of it.
That, of course, is the rub: Apple controls the algorithm, both in terms of what it looks for and what bugs it may or may not have, as well as the input, which in the case of CSAM scanning is the database from NCMEC. Apple has certainly worked hard to be a company that users trust, but we already know that that trust doesn’t extend everywhere: Apple has, under Chinese government pressure, put Chinese user iCloud data on state-owned enterprise servers, along with the encryption keys necessary to access it. What happens when China announces its version of the NCMEC, which not only includes the horrific imagery Apple’s system is meant to capture, but also images and memes the government deems illegal?
The fundamental issue — and the first reason why I think Apple made a mistake here — is that there is a meaningful difference between capability and policy. One of the most powerful arguments in Apple’s favor in the 2016 San Bernardino case is that the company didn’t even have the means to break into the iPhone in question, and that to build the capability would open the company up to a multitude of requests that were far less pressing in nature, and weaken the company’s ability to stand up to foreign governments. In this case, though, Apple is building the capability, and the only thing holding the company back is policy.
Then again, Apple’s policy isn’t the only one that matters: both the UK and the EU are moving forward on bills that mandate online service companies proactively look for and report CSAM. Indeed, I wouldn’t be surprised if this were the most important factor behind Apple’s move: the company doesn’t want to give up on end-to-end encryption — and likely wants to expand it — which leaves on-device scanning as the only way to satisfy governments not (just) in China but also the West.
Cloud Versus Device
I think that there is another solution to Apple’s conundrum; what is frustrating from my perspective is that I think the company is already mostly there. Consider the status quo: back in 2020 Reuters reported that Apple decided to not encrypt iCloud backups at the FBI’s request:
Apple Inc. dropped plans to let iPhone users fully encrypt backups of their devices in the company’s iCloud service after the FBI complained that the move would harm investigations, six sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. The tech giant’s reversal, about two years ago, has not previously been reported. It shows how much Apple has been willing to help U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies, despite taking a harder line in high-profile legal disputes with the government and casting itself as a defender of its customers’ information.
This has a number of significant implications for Apple’s security claims, and is why earlier this year I ranked iMessage as being less secure than Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and Facebook Messenger:
iMessage encrypts messages end-to-end by default; however, if you have iCloud backup turned on, your messages can be accessed by Apple (who has the keys for iCloud backups) and, by extension, law enforcement with a warrant. Unlike WhatsApp, though, this is both on by default and cannot be turned off on a granular basis.
This caveat applies to almost everything on your iPhone: if you give in to the never-ending prompts to sign-in to iCloud and its on-by-default backup solution, your data is accessible to Apple and, by extension, law enforcement with a warrant. I actually think this is reasonable! I wrote this when that Reuters report came out:
Go back to what I said above: determined actors will have access to encryption and facial recognition. Anyone trying to argue whether or not these technologies should exist is not living in reality. It follows then, that we should take care to ensure that good actors have access to these technologies too. That means not making them illegal.
Second, though, legitimate societal concerns about the needs of law enforcement and the radicalizing nature of the Internet should be taken seriously. That means we should think very carefully about making encryption the default…This also splits the difference when it comes to principles: users have agency — they can ensure that everything they do is encrypted — while total privacy is available but not given by default.
I actually think that Apple does an excellent job of striking that balance today. When it comes to the iPhone itself, Apple is the only entity that can make it truly secure; no individual can build their own secure enclave that sits at the root of iPhone security. Therefore, they are right to do so: everyone has access to encryption.
From there it is possible to build a fully secure environment: use only encrypted communications, use encrypted backups to a computer secured by its own hardware-based authentication scheme, etc. Taking the slightly easier route, though — iCloud backups, Facebook messaging, etc. — means some degree of vulnerability
如今 Google Photos 的合作,將可以稍微緩解相關問題,canon相機收購canon 用戶只要按照原來照片傳輸的形式,就可以直接把照片備份到自己的 Google One 雲端帳戶,一來除了可以直接讓遠端的客戶透過 Google Photo 連結查看照片,一般家庭用戶也可以直接用相同的方式更新自己家裡的數位相框。
當然啦!這個作法有一個大前提,就是要成為 Google One 的用戶。canon相機收購canon 與 Google 雙方將開放用戶免費使用一個月 100GB 的 Google One 雲端空間。
Google 官方指出,自兩年前啟動 Google Photos 合作夥伴計劃至今,已經跟上百家廠商達成合作,藉此讓用戶可以用更簡單的方式,在其他產品直接觀看照片和影片。相關合作成果也在這兩年的大型展覽,好比說在 MWC 2018 期間,Google Photos 專區就展示了透過帶有螢幕的智慧喇叭,直接用類似數位相框的形式,顯示家庭相簿。